1,992 students not offered campus accommodation this year; OSA’s explanation dissatisfying
6 04 2008Hannah Yan | h_y@nus.edu.sg
the ridge news
A NUSSU Publication
April. 4, 2008
Story Highlights:
- Statistics of successful and unsuccessful applicants were revealed by OSA.
- Alternative solutions proposed include placing additional beds and factoring in the distance from home to campus.
- Students questioned the fairness of CCA system.
- A committee will be set up to look into RHAPS.
There are 1,992 students with no rooms to stay on Kent Ridge campus after this year’s hostel allocation.
Some went to a dialogue session with the Office of Student Affairs (OSA) held at Prince George’s Park (PGP) Auditorium on April 4 and left with no concrete answers provided.
After the release of results on March 27, many students flocked to the OSA to appeal about the result and ask for an explanation.
However, everyone went back with a different answer and some even received wrong information from the front desk, according to Siddharth Choudhry, a third year mechanical engineering student.
According to the OSA, out of 5,175 applicants, 38 percent are unsuccessful, compared to last year’s 33 percent out of 4,707 applicants, marking a 5 percent rise and the highest ever cut-off level of Co-curricular Activity (CCA) points in history.
As some international students demanded, the OSA offered the breakdown of statistics-among the successful senior applicants, 1,001 are local and 2,182 are international; among the unsuccessful, 848 are local and 1,144 are international.
International students and some permanent residents (PR) whose families do not own housing properties in Singapore are especially worried about a roof over head. Some local students said they also have compelling reason to stay on campus.
Some students recommend placing an additional bed to the single rooms.
Associate Professor Tan Teck Koon, Dean of Students, referred to the proposed three-bed room in Nanyang Technological University, which was met with public objection, to show that it is not practical.
Other students suggested giving priority to those living far away or from overseas.
However, Associate Professor Tan said this is a system riddled with loopholes.
He gave the reasons that the OSA will need to check the accuracy of all addresses, and consider local students who live far away but have convenient means of transport.
Associate Professor Tan repeated his advice to students: “go and find a place.” And he advised the students to find a place before the holiday begins.
But for many international students, it is not a simple thing to do.
With the final exams looming, searching for accommodation now does not seem to be feasible. As some will go back to home countries during the holiday, they may not immediately find accommodation after returning. “When I am back to the airport with my luggage, where do I tell the taxi driver to go?” A student asked.
Shahanah Joomun, a second-year computing student from Mauritus, said if she sources for accommodation now, she has to sign a one- or two- year contract and even though she is not staying during the holidays she still have to pay.
The OSA encourages students with financial difficulties to apply for subsidiary loans from them.
Students did not find this as a viable solution either. Taskeen Edoo is a second-year computing student from Mauritus. Her father works on a plantation and her mother does not work. She said, “We came to Singapore with a worry-free mindset that we can get grants and won’t add burden to our families. But if we have to take up another loan, now it just means more burden.”
A student commented: “how could NUS advertise itself as a global university while it cannot satisfy the needs of its own students?” Another student said students today will become alumnus later and when they look back, they may find that they were not treated fairly.
Students can apply to be on the waiting list for campus accommodation.
In the case where some freshmen do not turn up next semester, places originally reserved to them will be released to the current students. The application for waiting list will be opened in August and will be on a first-come-first-serve basis as well as depending on students’ preference ranking of hostels.
Off-campus accommodation opportunities are in a database on the OSA website but it needed to be updated.
Students also questioned the fairness of CCA points system that determines the hostel allocation results.
Dilesh Weerasuriya, a second-year computing student from Sri Lanka, said the residents of PGP are disadvantaged in competing with hall residents for accommodation as halls offer more activities and higher points.
“I was a group leader of orientation camp and I got only one point for it. People staying in hall get eight points out of this. It is unfair because we work equally hard,” he explained.
Students on Industrial Attachment also expressed their concerns. Though they are physically in Singapore, they do not have time to participate in campus activities becausing of work and are not getting the same priority as students on exchange.
The fact that some presidents of clubs abuse the use of points to reward their friends or to import players to participate in inter-hall games has been brought to the Dean’s attention.
According to OSA, in lieu of the increasing demand for student accommodation, they built Prince George’s Park, Ridge View Residence Tower Block, Kuok Foundation House in the 1990s and block leased Boon Lay hostel to house more students in 2007.
After receiving students’ feedback, they also increased the number of shuttle buses from Boon Lay and vamped up the internet system to ensure students residing there have internet access.
Associate Professor Tan said that it is not easy to get a large number of rooms with a reasonable price off campus. With the University Town hostel due to open in 2010, he said: “I’m confident that in 2010 the university can accommodate all international students for their duration of study.”
Near the end of the session, Choudhry said: “we came here to find a solution, but after two and a half hours we are still hopeless.”
The Vice-Dean of students, Associate Professor Tan Ern Ser, said a solution cannot be found overnight and a committee including members of the OSA and NUSSU will be set up to look into Revised Hall Allocation Point System.
Updated on April 14 with clarification from NUSSU that in 2010 the University Town hostel will be able to accommodate all international students instead of all students. NUSSU and OSA will do further studies on room sharing.






<>
so what are the student suppose to do now? go back to our home countries and wait till 2010? It seems to me at OSA has not put ‘emselves into the students’ shoes and consider our welfare. all the talk of 2010 is meaningless to those who are without housing this year.
the use of cca points is a vicious cycle itself. Everyone is aware tt some org are giving out cca points a in more unregulated manner, just so that whoever their members get higher cca points. isnt this a reason strong enough to abolish the cca system?
how about auctioning the rooms on ebay.sg LOL
loopholes? i think rather loopholes in OSA answers/replies. i may get accommodation for my 2nd year but i may affect me in the next two years. OSA pls find off-campus accommodation for those not allocated fast, i mean really fast within the next 2-3 weeks so they have the peace of mind to have their break back in their home country.
I do think the priority should be given to overseas students. I am personally an international student. Frankly, I will stay in my home if I studied in my home country. However, here, we do not have a choice. The housing fee around NUS is damn high now. I do not think international students can not afford it.
The CCA system also has problem.
camp outside OSA, University Hall, in the Forum, SRC Field… no choice lah~
i think the system which guarantee all international students on-campus accommodation for 1st and 2nd year is one of the contributing factors of the problem. Many 1st yr international students with zero CCA point get to stay which is unfair for those 2nd & 3rd yr international students who worked hard for CCA pts but cant get to stay. I am an international student myself but i think it is fairer if every1 is competing based on what they have contributed throughout the year.
It seems like everyone conveniently forgot that numerous rooms are “reserved” for USP students in campus. These rooms are left empty until a USP student decides to live in the residences.
Has anyone looked at the trend of the acceptance rates for local students? I expect that less local students will be staying next semester due to the fee hike, so is it a matter of the university taking in more international students that it can handle?
Also, I believe that the statement regarding rooms reserved for USP students is incorrect. The rooms are not left empty till a USP student decides to live in the residences. The allocation is done around the same period as the allocation for everyone else. I’m not going to argue about whether USP students deserve such rights, but it’s not going to be fair to suddenly tell them that they have no rooms either.